Difference between revisions of "Anarchisme sans adjectif"
m |
m (→History) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Le créateur de l'expression est [[Fernando Tarrida del Marmol]], qui l'utilisa en Novembre 1889, à Barcelone. Il dirigea ses commentaires envers les anarchistes communistes et collectivistes, qui à cet époque, en Espagne, tenaient un intense débat sur les mérites des 2 théories. L'''anarchisme sans adjectif'' était une tentative de montrer une plus grande tolérance entre les tendances libertaires et d'être clair que les anarchistes ne devraient pas imposer de plan économique préconçu à qui que ce soit, même dans la théorie. Anarchists without adjectives tended either to reject all particular anarchist economic models as faulty, or take a pluralist position of embracing them all to a limited degree in order that they may keep one another in check. Regardless, to these anarchists the economic preferences are considered to be of "secondary importance" to abolishing all authority, with free experimentation the one rule of a free society. | Le créateur de l'expression est [[Fernando Tarrida del Marmol]], qui l'utilisa en Novembre 1889, à Barcelone. Il dirigea ses commentaires envers les anarchistes communistes et collectivistes, qui à cet époque, en Espagne, tenaient un intense débat sur les mérites des 2 théories. L'''anarchisme sans adjectif'' était une tentative de montrer une plus grande tolérance entre les tendances libertaires et d'être clair que les anarchistes ne devraient pas imposer de plan économique préconçu à qui que ce soit, même dans la théorie. Anarchists without adjectives tended either to reject all particular anarchist economic models as faulty, or take a pluralist position of embracing them all to a limited degree in order that they may keep one another in check. Regardless, to these anarchists the economic preferences are considered to be of "secondary importance" to abolishing all authority, with free experimentation the one rule of a free society. | ||
| − | == | + | == Histoire == |
| − | + | La perspective théorique connue comme "anarquismo sin adjetivos" fue le produit d'un intense débat à l'intérieur du mouvement anarchiste. Les racines de ses arguments peuvent être retrouvés dans le développement de l'[[Anarcho-communisme]] après la mort de [[Bakounine]] en [[1876]]. While not entirely dissimilar to [[collectivist anarchism]] (as can be seen from [[James Guillaume]]'s famous work "On Building the New Social Order" within Bakunin on Anarchism, the collectivists did see their economic system evolving into free communism), Communist Anarchists developed, deepened and enriched Bakunin's work just as Bakunin had developed, deepened and enriched [[Pierre-Joseph Proudhon|Proudhon]]'s. Communist Anarchism was associated with such anarchists as [[Élisée Reclus]], [[Carlo Cafiero]], [[Errico Malatesta]] and (most famously) [[Peter Kropotkin]]. | |
| − | + | Les idées anarcho-communiste remplacèrent le [[Collectivisme anarchiste]] au titre de tendance anarchiste la plus populaire en Europe, excepté en Espagne. Here the major issue was not the question of communism (although for [[Ricardo Mella]] this played a part) but a question of the modification of strategy and tactics implied by Communist Anarchism. À cette époque (les années 1880s), the anarcho-communists stressed local cells of anarchist militants, generally opposed trade unionism as were characterized by a degree of anti-organisation. Unsurprisingly, such a change in strategy and tactics came in for a lot of discussion from the Spanish Collectivists who strongly supported [[working class]] organisation and struggle. | |
| − | + | Ce conflit se propagea rapidement en dehors de l'Espagne et la discussion se poursuivit dans les pages du journal [[La Revolte]], Ã Paris. This provoked many anarchists to agree with Malatesta's argument that "[i]t is not right for us, to say the least, to fall into strife over mere hypotheses." [quoted by Max Nettlau, A Short History of Anarchism, pp. 198-9] Over time, most anarchists agreed (to use Nettlau's words) that "we cannot foresee the economic development of the future" [Op. Cit., p. 201] and so started to stress what they had in common, rather than the different visions of how a free society would operate. As time progressed, most anarcho-communists saw that ignoring the [[labour movement]] ensured that their ideas did not reach the working class while most anarcho-communists stressed their commitment to communist ideals and their arrival sooner, rather than later, after a revolution. | |
Similarly, in the United States, there was an intense debate at the same time between Individualist and Communist anarchists. There, [[Benjamin Tucker]] was arguing that anarcho-communists were not anarchists while [[Johann Most]] was saying similar things about Tucker's ideas. Just as people like Mella and Tarrida put forward the idea of tolerance between anarchist groups, so anarchists like [[Voltairine de Cleyre]] "came to label herself simply 'Anarchist,' and called like Malatesta for an 'Anarchism without Adjectives,' since in the absence of government many different experiments would probably be tried in various localities in order to determine the most appropriate form." [Peter Marshall, Demanding the Impossible, p. 393] | Similarly, in the United States, there was an intense debate at the same time between Individualist and Communist anarchists. There, [[Benjamin Tucker]] was arguing that anarcho-communists were not anarchists while [[Johann Most]] was saying similar things about Tucker's ideas. Just as people like Mella and Tarrida put forward the idea of tolerance between anarchist groups, so anarchists like [[Voltairine de Cleyre]] "came to label herself simply 'Anarchist,' and called like Malatesta for an 'Anarchism without Adjectives,' since in the absence of government many different experiments would probably be tried in various localities in order to determine the most appropriate form." [Peter Marshall, Demanding the Impossible, p. 393] | ||
Revision as of 20:13, 25 July 2006
| L'avancement de cette traduction est de %. |
Catégorie:En traduction L'Anarchisme sans adjectif est une forme d'anarchisme sans trait d'union, sans qualificatif(ex: communiste, mutualiste, individualiste...). Pour d'autres, il fut comprit comme une attitude de tolérance de la coexistance de différentes tendances anarchistes. Voir Anarchist Ideology and the Working Class Movement in Spain, 1868-1898, p. 135
Origines
Le créateur de l'expression est Fernando Tarrida del Marmol, qui l'utilisa en Novembre 1889, à Barcelone. Il dirigea ses commentaires envers les anarchistes communistes et collectivistes, qui à cet époque, en Espagne, tenaient un intense débat sur les mérites des 2 théories. L'anarchisme sans adjectif était une tentative de montrer une plus grande tolérance entre les tendances libertaires et d'être clair que les anarchistes ne devraient pas imposer de plan économique préconçu à qui que ce soit, même dans la théorie. Anarchists without adjectives tended either to reject all particular anarchist economic models as faulty, or take a pluralist position of embracing them all to a limited degree in order that they may keep one another in check. Regardless, to these anarchists the economic preferences are considered to be of "secondary importance" to abolishing all authority, with free experimentation the one rule of a free society.
Histoire
La perspective théorique connue comme "anarquismo sin adjetivos" fue le produit d'un intense débat à l'intérieur du mouvement anarchiste. Les racines de ses arguments peuvent être retrouvés dans le développement de l'Anarcho-communisme après la mort de Bakounine en 1876. While not entirely dissimilar to collectivist anarchism (as can be seen from James Guillaume's famous work "On Building the New Social Order" within Bakunin on Anarchism, the collectivists did see their economic system evolving into free communism), Communist Anarchists developed, deepened and enriched Bakunin's work just as Bakunin had developed, deepened and enriched Proudhon's. Communist Anarchism was associated with such anarchists as Élisée Reclus, Carlo Cafiero, Errico Malatesta and (most famously) Peter Kropotkin.
Les idées anarcho-communiste remplacèrent le Collectivisme anarchiste au titre de tendance anarchiste la plus populaire en Europe, excepté en Espagne. Here the major issue was not the question of communism (although for Ricardo Mella this played a part) but a question of the modification of strategy and tactics implied by Communist Anarchism. À cette époque (les années 1880s), the anarcho-communists stressed local cells of anarchist militants, generally opposed trade unionism as were characterized by a degree of anti-organisation. Unsurprisingly, such a change in strategy and tactics came in for a lot of discussion from the Spanish Collectivists who strongly supported working class organisation and struggle.
Ce conflit se propagea rapidement en dehors de l'Espagne et la discussion se poursuivit dans les pages du journal La Revolte, Ã Paris. This provoked many anarchists to agree with Malatesta's argument that "[i]t is not right for us, to say the least, to fall into strife over mere hypotheses." [quoted by Max Nettlau, A Short History of Anarchism, pp. 198-9] Over time, most anarchists agreed (to use Nettlau's words) that "we cannot foresee the economic development of the future" [Op. Cit., p. 201] and so started to stress what they had in common, rather than the different visions of how a free society would operate. As time progressed, most anarcho-communists saw that ignoring the labour movement ensured that their ideas did not reach the working class while most anarcho-communists stressed their commitment to communist ideals and their arrival sooner, rather than later, after a revolution.
Similarly, in the United States, there was an intense debate at the same time between Individualist and Communist anarchists. There, Benjamin Tucker was arguing that anarcho-communists were not anarchists while Johann Most was saying similar things about Tucker's ideas. Just as people like Mella and Tarrida put forward the idea of tolerance between anarchist groups, so anarchists like Voltairine de Cleyre "came to label herself simply 'Anarchist,' and called like Malatesta for an 'Anarchism without Adjectives,' since in the absence of government many different experiments would probably be tried in various localities in order to determine the most appropriate form." [Peter Marshall, Demanding the Impossible, p. 393]
These debates had a lasting impact on the anarchist movement, with such noted anarchists as de Cleyre, Malatesta, Nettlau and Reclus adopting the tolerant perspective that is embodied in the expression "anarchism without adjectives".
Further reading
A Short History of Anarchism, Max Nettlau (Freedom Press, 2001) (Pages 195-201 provide a summary)
- REDIRECT Modèle:Wikipedia (traduit)
